🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in graves at risk from shoreline retreat state that indecision on how best to address the issue is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Historic Graveyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being consumed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation sets out a range of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure locations. Authorities say it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing in search of treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while working abroad. His mother said she lost sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to think this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families want additional sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to continue for now. Different voices argue the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official said the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with residents.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the options. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires productive community discussions to find the right solutions for each village.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in life after death, offering a theological perspective on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.